FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [January 2015 Threads]
Dear friends.
I have the following problem – my program ends in the HardFaultHandler.
I use STM32F429i-discovery board.
On the first place I took the demo project (CORTEXM4FSTM32F407ZG-SK). I substituted several files and managed to run the kernel. Then I changed something (I really do not remember what) – and the problem occurred. I tried to do everything from scratch – nothing changed. Then I took template project presented by ST and added I suppose all necessary files for FreeRTOS (again from the ST package). All the code works properly before vTaskStartScheduler(); (I just display test string on the lcd).
I tried to use the code by Joseph Yiu and it helped me to determine the place in which the program goes to the HardFault. It is in the file – portcm4.c
portBASETYPE xPortStartScheduler( void )
{
/* Make PendSV and SysTick the lowest priority interrupts. */
*(portNVICSYSPRI2) |= portNVICPENDSVPRI;
*(portNVICSYSPRI2) |= portNVICSYSTICK_PRI;
/* Start the timer that generates the tick ISR. Interrupts are disabled
here already. */
prvSetupTimerInterrupt();
/* Initialise the critical nesting count ready for the first task. */
uxCriticalNesting = 0;
/* Ensure the VFP is enabled - it should be anyway. */
vPortEnableVFP();
/* Lazy save always. */
*( portFPCCR ) |= portASPEN_AND_LSPEN_BITS;
/* Start the first task. */
vPortStartFirstTask();
/* Should not get here! */
return 0;
}
After stepping through return 0 – program goes to the HardFault.
In the disassembly window returne 0 is represented by the following:
MOVS R0, #0
POP {R1, PC}
The value in the register R1 (again thanks to Joseph Yiu program) which then is loaded to PC points to the empty region (B55F38B9) – if I determined correctly it is 512 MB Block 5 FMC.
What should I check next?
PS: Demo project of ST with FreeRTOS works great, but it has much more then I need, and when I tried to remove certain parts I finished with compilation problems.
PPS. In the current project I had to add the following to the main.c module to pass the compilation:
void EndIdleMonitor(void)
{
}
void StartIdleMonitor(void)
{
}
void vApplicationTickHook(void)
{
}
void vApplicationMallocFailedHook(void)
{
}
void vApplicationIdleHook(void)
{
}
You code should not return from the call to vPortStartFirstTask(); (the clue is on the next line, where the comment says "should not get here").
vPortStartFirstTask() calls SVC 0, and I am guessing your problem is related to not have an SVC handler installed.
Normally FreeRTOS uses vPortSVCHandler() as the SVC handler, which can be mapped to its CMSIS name using a #define as described on this page: http://www.freertos.org/FAQHelp.html
What is installed as the SVC handler? It might be an ST handler that needs to chain with the FreeRTOS handler, but I think you can just install the FreeRTOS handler outright.
Regards.
Thank you for the quick respond. The problem was exactly as you explained.
What I did:
1) I added #define vPortSVCHandler SVCHandler
#define xPortPendSVHandler PendSVHandler
#define xPortSysTickHandler SysTickHandler
to the FreeRTOSConfig.h file
2) Commented PendSVHandler, SysTickHandler, and SVCHandler in the stm32f4xx_it.c file.
Did I do right?
Provided none of the ST libraries are relying on those handlers then
that is fine.
Regards.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.